This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of apply.

Ryzen2-Feature

Ryzen 7'south debut just nether iii weeks ago clearly kicked off an upgrade cycle for AMD fans and potentially some Intel converts — in the iii weeks we've been watching, the Ryzen 1800X, 1700X, and 1700 have all maintained spots in the Meridian 20, and typically the Peak 15. With 6-7 CPUs in the Top twenty compared with 2-3 prior to the launch of Ryzen, AMD is clearly better positioned (and earning at to the lowest degree somewhat more money, thanks to higher CPU prices). Still, the cheapest Ryzen 7 CPU clocks in at $329, and that's not exactly affordable.

Today, AMD is announcing its new Ryzen 5 CPU family unit. While the naming evokes the Cadre i5, the products themselves do not. Beginning upward, we've got a pair of vi-core chips; the Ryzen five 1600X and the Ryzen 5 1600. Both of them have SMT enabled, but the 1600X has a 3.6GHz base clock and a 4GHz Heave, while the 1600 has a iii.2GHz base clock and a 3.6GHz boost.

Ryzen5-6

Drop downwardly the stack again, and we've got the Ryzen 5 1500X and Ryzen 5 1400. Both CPUs offer quad-cores and viii threads, with clock speeds of 3.5GHz – 3.7GHz and iii.2GHz-three.4GHz respectively. While this is a bear upon lower than some of Intel'southward Core i5s, the addition of SMT should more than compensate for lower clocks in multi-threaded workloads.

Ryzen5-4

I don't plan to spend much fourth dimension talking about chipsets, but I wanted to give an updated version of the image that's been floating effectually for awhile. The X370 and B350 are the obvious enthusiast platforms, with the X300 available for SFF options.

RyzenPlatform1

Of course, none of this means much if the prices aren't good. Check this out. AMD isn't done putting a world of hurt on Intel's high-finish production stack.

We've put together a chart below to show how AMD's new Ryzen 5 stacks up confronting Intel's lineup, but nosotros have to annotation that it's not a perfect lucifer. At that place are two sets of chips you tin conceivably stack upwards against the quad-core Ryzen 5's — the Core i7 family unit, which has 4 cores, eight threads, and is vastly more expensive, or the Core i5, which has quad-cores, no SMT, and is more competitive within the same cost ring. We decided to bear witness 2 comparison points for the 1500X, but stayed with an i5 comparator with the Ryzen 5 1400. If you're eyeing a $169 chip, stepping up to a CPU that costs twice every bit much probably isn't something you're very interested in doing (and in that location aren't enough desktop chips in the Kaby Lake Cadre i7 family to requite u.s. much to compare with anyway).

CPU-Price-Comp

If you thought AMD was going to confine itself to gunning for Intel's peak-stop Broadwell-Due east chips, think again. The six-cadre Ryzen 5's are priced at xl% and fifty% of their Intel equivalents, respectively. The quad-core chips are a bit of a mix. If you compare Ryzen 5 1500X against the Core i7-7700, the 1500X is definitely cheaper, only won't lucifer an i7-7700's performance (the 7700K is more than expensive, simply also clocks college). If you compare Ryzen v 1500X confronting a Core i5, the cost difference is marginal, meaning this comes downward to a pure performance fight. With eight threads vs. iv, Ryzen should win that struggle, but we're not going to phone call the state of affairs either way until nosotros have silicon in-hand.

The Ryzen 5 1400 is in a similar position. It'south somewhat cheaper than the i5, but we'll demand to see performance before we render a verdict. But based on this lineup, AMD has a potent set of products, particularly at the vi-core level. Ryzen will simply have been in-market for a calendar month when AMD'south next quarterly conference call rolls effectually, but a lot of eyes volition exist watching to see how the visitor'due south CPU & GPU revenue looks. So far, it seems like they've got something to look frontwards to.